Sunday, June 22, 2008

Review of: Be Kind Rewind

Let me start off by saying that I'm a big Jack Black fan, sometimes to a fault. Let me also say that I never turn movies off in the middle of a viewing. I didn't necessarily turn this one off but I fast forwarded to the end which is I guess just as bad.

In the movie, Be Kind Rewind is the name of an old school video store in North Jersey somewhere. It might be the last place on earth that actually rents VHS tapes. The plot consists of Jack Black acting ultra Jack Blacky and he somehow manages to erase every tape in the store. Mos Def and Black then proceed to try and re-tape each film with them and only their one or two weirdo friends as the actors. For a split second (blink and you would've missed it) this movie had hope. I actually laughed out loud when the filmed their version of Ghostbusters. However, that was the high point of the movie by far. It really goes no where after that and I really had no interest at all. Danny Glover just looked like he missed Riggs a little too much. He brought nothing to the table. Mos def, who has really grown as an actor just didn't add enough to make this one possible.

Sorry this one is so short, but I really have nothing else to say about this movie. I wouldn't recommend it to my worst enemy. Avoid this one.


Be Kind Rewind verdict: Not guilty

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Review of: Premonition

Sometimes I'm really glad that I have HBO, Showtime and Cinemax On Demand. Those channels are perfect for those times at night when there is absolutely nothing on TV and you can just find some random movie that you would never watch at any other time.

Premonition was just that movie. It stars Sandra Bullock and (I'll call him) the guy from Nip/Tuck. Honestly it looks like he had too much Nip/Tuck on his own face. The basic setup of the movie is almost out of the Memento realm in that we find out at the beginning that NT (nip/tuck) guy has died. The movie then does this crazy back and forth jumping from day to day to show you how, when or why his death could've been prevented.

A lot of critics at the time panned the movie due to this time jumping aspect. However, aside from a few difficulties in figuring out what day it was when she woke up, I didn't mind it at all. I didn't think it was super super confusing and I was excited to see how the whole thing was going to be resolved.

Sandra Bullock asks a very simple question that basically carried the narrative for most of the film. "If I let Jim die, is that the same thing as killing him?". Throughout the movie, we as an audience will go through the same feelings as Bullock. Did NT deserve to die, should she have done more to save him? Ultimately, and I wont give it away, I personally think her choice could have gone either way. Its an interesting question and the director didn't try to hide any meaning in it and I think that helps us as viewers follow the plot that much better.

As for the actors, Bullock does a great job as the almost crazy housewife that is trying to piece her life together weird day after (or weird day before) weird day. Its funny looking at Bullock on screen sometimes because you are immediately transported back to that bus that can't fall under 50 every time you see her. Not saying its negative but for some reason its one of the strongest actor/character ties I personally have.

My main problem with the actors in the movie was Peter Stormare. When I first got put on to him through Prison Break on Fox, he was a breath of fresh air playing Abbruzzi, and then I even loved him as the Devil in Constantine. It just seems that lately, his now grating accent and mannerisms have reduced him to playing the same role in every movie and I've had enough for a little while. He always plays that half snarky, half "better than though" guy in every role he has. Most critics out there have this weird love affair with this guy and it seems that his presence in every movie is always a "scene-stealer". I honestly just don't get it. Either way its not that big of a deal because his role is very minimal in this and in all honesty probably would have been better on the cutting room floor. NT guy does a little-less-than-OK in his role. I know you were supposed to be kept in suspense about him for the most part, but I think he could've emoted a little bit more. I mean, the first shot of him is as a loving husband just buying a new house for him and his family and then all of a sudden we're supposed to believe that his feelings have done a possible 180. I'm not sure it worked or maybe you just needed another actor.

All in all I'd recommend this one just on the basis of a cool plot and good acting by Bullock.

Premonition verdict - Guilty

Saturday, June 14, 2008

The Strangers

Inspired by “real events” The Strangers, unlike many of its genre, is the kind horror film that relies more on suspense and timing, as opposed to mere shock value. In this sense it might more aptly be called a suspense-horror film, more in the vein of say Hitchcock than Craven. While I certainly do not mean to compare this film to any Hitchcock horror film, The Strangers does at times feel like a throw back kind of movie.

The story begins with a young couple’s sad return from a party. We quickly learn that Kristen, played by Liv Tyler has refused James’ (Scot Speedman) marriage proposal. James has adorned the secluded vacation home with candles, roses, champagne etc. What was meant to be a romantic time turns into an evening (90 min for us) of frightening, mind bending, head wrenching terror. The couple is terrorized by three white- masked intruders, one male and two females. I have to say, the mask worn by the male assailant is perhaps the most subtly frightening scary mask I’ve seen since Jason.

Without a basic plot, or motivation for the ongoing terror, this film relies more on moments of gripping horror which at times will enthrall the audience. I often found myself cringing to my chair, imploring the actors to do this… and do that. If a horror/suspense film can get you to engage in this way with the players on screen, then for all intent and purposes it has done an adequate job.

I’ve read a few reviews that say this film uses silence to its advantage. Here I must disagree somewhat. It is not silence, but the absence of dialogue; the film absorbs its audience with its usage of sound effects and imagery. In this way the story gets told not through dialogue or inner monologue but through visual and auditory methods. Again, this relies more on a classic kind of story telling; what we anticipate happening is what grips us. This is at times in stark contrast with recent horror films that rely more on gore and shock value to entice. No chopped off limbs here, no gooey blobs of skin to clean up-- just good old fashioned suspense and horror.

Some may view The Strangers as a slow film that goes nowhere. Pending on your taste this may or may not be true. (Possible Spoiler ahead)

There does not appear to be a rhyme or reason for the terror the three assailants imbue on their victims. If it was just murder they are after they could do this all at once. Instead, they seem to want to stretch out the agony, leaving notes to their victims on windows, as well as often disappearing when the two seem most vulnerable. To the question, “why are you doing this,” the only answer offered is a creepy, “Because you were home.” If you are so inclined this may open up a philosophical discussion of a post-structural bent. There is no underlying meaning or purpose. The actions perpetrated upon the victims occurs simply because they happen to be there. Any other meaning inscribed upon the events is that which you as an audience member decides. Paraphrasing the French Deconstructionist Jacques Derrida here : there is nothing beyond the text. In The Strangers, there is simply no real context, no readily discernible meaning with which we can attach ourselves. At the level of one seeking entertainment, this can either annoy or please, pending on taste.

While I was vividly engaged for the bulk of the film, towards the end I felt myself thinking, ok, enough is enough. There are only so many scare-able moments you can have—get to the point. For the most part though this was an enjoyable movie. If you are looking to be scared, this movie will get the job done, providing of course you have no problem dealing with the fact that there is neither a real plot nor a reason for the terror that ensues for nearly 90 minutes.

VEDRDICT- HUNG JURY (either you'll be scared out of your wits, vowing never to spend a night in the country again...or you'll be terribly annoyed with the lack of plot and reason)